主要將《中國藥典》2010年版(ChP 2010)收入的甘草質量標準與歐洲藥典(EP 8.0)、美國藥典(USP 37)和日本藥典(JP 16)3部藥典中甘草的質量標準進行對比分析,并對含量、重金屬、農藥殘留、赭曲霉素A等幾項主要指標的限量標準進行了比較,了解《中國藥典》中甘草的質量標準和其他3部藥典的異同,使中藥材質量標準向國際標準靠攏,以適應國際需求.

In this paper, the quality standards of licorice in Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP 2010) were compared with those in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP 8.0), United States Pharmacopeia (USP 37), and Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP 16), and several main indicators such as content, heavy metals, pesticide residues, ochratoxin A, and other limits were compared with the other three pharmacopoeias, so as to understand the similarities and differences between the quality standards of licorice in ChP 2010 and the three other pharmacopoeias. As a result, traditional Chinese medicine quality standards could get closer to international standards to meet international demand.