[關(guān)鍵詞]
[摘要]
主要將《中國(guó)藥典》2010年版(ChP 2010)收入的甘草質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與歐洲藥典(EP 8.0)、美國(guó)藥典(USP 37)和日本藥典(JP 16)3部藥典中甘草的質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析,并對(duì)含量、重金屬、農(nóng)藥殘留、赭曲霉素A等幾項(xiàng)主要指標(biāo)的限量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)進(jìn)行了比較,了解《中國(guó)藥典》中甘草的質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和其他3部藥典的異同,使中藥材質(zhì)量標(biāo)準(zhǔn)向國(guó)際標(biāo)準(zhǔn)靠攏,以適應(yīng)國(guó)際需求.
[Key word]
[Abstract]
In this paper, the quality standards of licorice in Chinese Pharmacopoeia (ChP 2010) were compared with those in the European Pharmacopoeia (EP 8.0), United States Pharmacopeia (USP 37), and Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP 16), and several main indicators such as content, heavy metals, pesticide residues, ochratoxin A, and other limits were compared with the other three pharmacopoeias, so as to understand the similarities and differences between the quality standards of licorice in ChP 2010 and the three other pharmacopoeias. As a result, traditional Chinese medicine quality standards could get closer to international standards to meet international demand.
[中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)]
[基金項(xiàng)目]